SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 647

2007(3) JLJ 231
(SUPREME COURT)
A.K. Mathur and Dalveer Bhandari, JJ.
Rama and Company (M/s.) v. State of M.P. and another
SLP(C) No.9186 of 2007; against the order of M.P. High Court,
Gwalior, passed in Writ Appeal Nos.342-45 of 2006 reported in
2007(3) JLJ 220; Decided on 9.7.2007.

Advocates:
Ravindra Shrivastava, Senior Advocate for petitioners;
Kailash Chand and Jayant Mehta for respondents.

Headnote:Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 (M.P.) -- S.2 -- writ appeal under -- does not lie against an order of Single Judge who heard the case under supervisory jurisdiction, not exercising original jurisdiction. 2007(3) JLJ 220 affirmed. [Para 2

       mPp U;k;ky; ¼[kaM U;k;ihB dks vihy½ vf/kfu;e] 2005¼e-iz-½ && /kkjk 2 && fjV vihy && ewy vf/kdkfjrk iz;qDr djrs gq, ugha] vfirq i;Zos{k.k vf/kdkfjrk ds v/khu ekeyk lquus okys ,dy U;k;k/kh‘k ds vkns‘k ds fo#) ugha gksxhA 2007¼3½ ts ,y ts 220 vfHkiq"VA

        ¿ iSjk 2À

ORDER

1. Delay condoned.

2. There is no ground to interfere with the order of the High Court as the question of law had already been decided by this Court that if any writ petition is filed before the High Court against the order of the Board of Revenue and against that order of the High Court no LPA is maintainable as this is not the original order. The special leave petition is, therefore, dismissed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top