A.M.NAIK
Ramgopal Kanhaiyalal – Appellant
Versus
Dinanath Gyasilal – Respondent
1. This appeal is by defendant-tenants against a decree for eviction granted under section 12(1)(a) and (c) of the M.P. Accommodation-Control Act, 1961.
2. Short facts leading to the appeal are that the plaintiff-respondents instituted a suit for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent from M/s. Ramgopal Kanhaiyalal, a partnership firm with the averments that the suit shop is owned by Smt. Saraswatibai (plaintiff No.2) which is occupied by the defendant as a tenant @ Rs.180/- per month under an oral tenancy w.e.f. 1.2.1974. The plaintiff No.2 is not well educated so she authorised plaintiff No.1 for looking after her property and realization of rent. The defendant was inducted into the suit shop by the plaintiff No.1 in the aforesaid capacity. It is stated in the plaint that accordingly, the plaintiff No.1 is also a landlord of the defendant and has been impleaded as a plaintiff in order to avoid legal complications. The property devolved upon plaintiff No.2 due to death of Vinod Kumar. The plaintiff No.2 became an exclusive owner of the suit shop on account of being mother of Vinod Kumar who died during his bachelorhood on 8.8.1973. It was further stated in the plaint that
2. Sangamesh Printing Press v. Chief Executive Officer
4. Punjabrao v. State of Maharashtra reported as = 2002(1) MPWN 146
5. Shyam Bhagwan Dubey v. Sheikh Nizam and others reported as = 1994 JLJ 143
6. Mankunwarbai and others v. Sunderlal Rambharosa Jain reported as = 1978 JLJ 6
8. Bhagwati Prasad v. Rameshchand and others reported as = 1994 MPLJ 619
7. Sheela nd others v. Firm Prahlad Rai Prem Prakash reported as = 2002(2) JLJ 312
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.