SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 55

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Balmukund – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sudeep Deb for applicant; Sanjay Jain for respondent No. l;
Wakil Khan, Panel Lawyer for State.

ORDER

1. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.1995 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in Criminal Revision No. 6/94 whereby the order dated 29.7.1993 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tikamgarli in complaint Case No. 843/93 registering the case against the respondent No. 1 under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'the IPC'), the applicant has preferred this revision petition.

2. No exhaustive statement of the facts is necessary for the disposal of this revision petition. In brief the case of the applicant, who filed private complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, is that respondent Balmukund who is a Patwari, manipulated certain documents. According to the complaint, the applicant was given a Bhumiswami Patta on 15.9.1986 by the Gram Panchayat, Nayakhera of Khasra No. 959 measuring 50x50 sq. feet, total area 2,500 sq. feet, which is equivalent to .023 hectare, the total area of the said Khasra is .798 hectare. The contention of the applicant in his complaint is that despite the allotment in his favour, Naib Tehsildar Mr. Ashok Vyas allotted 0.5 hectare of land in favour of one Shanti Devi Sahu, which also includes the are

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top