SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 490

DIPAK MISRA
Haricharan – Appellant
Versus
M. Ojha – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Agrawal for applicants;
Sanjay Kumar Agrawal for non-applicants.

ORDER

Misra, J. -- 1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure the defendants/petitioners have called in question the legal propriety of the order dated 28.10,98 passed by the learned Second Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. 22-A/95.

2. The facts lie in a narrow compass The non-applicant No. 1 as plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit for specific performance of contract. It is averred in the plaint that an agreement for sale was entered into between the plaintiff and defendants on 11.11.94 in respect of the land situate at Khasra No. 757 in village Juna Bilaspur Patwari Circle No. 22. R.I. Circle, Bilaspur. As per the agreement the area of such Khasra has been given 7.830 sq. ft. and the rate per sq. ft. is fixed at Rs. 65/-. The applicant filed the written statement. After the written statement was filed certain issues were framed and Issue No. 3 related to valuation of the suit land. Initially, the plaintiff had valued the suit at Rs. 3,08,748/- and paid the court-fees thereon. As stated in the petition thereafter the plaintiff got the area demarcated and came to know that it was 6.426 sq. ft. and comp













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top