SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 46

R.B.DIXIT
Shanti Devi Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Radheysbyam Palod – Respondent


Advocates:
R.D. Jain with S.K. Jain for appellants; M.M. Kaushik for respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. feeling aggrieved by judgment and order dated 13.01.95 passed by Third Additional Judge to District Judge. Vidisha. in Civil suit No, 18/94. the plaintiffs/appellants have comeup in appeal to this Court and prayed for hearing of the suit on merits.

2, Appellants/plaintiffs had filed a suit before District Judge. Vidisha for declaration and mandatory injunction in respect of a partnership firm styled as" M/s Vidisha Auto Service" to declare that it is an exclusive dealership of the plaintiffs, According to the plaintiffs. defendant No, 2 Indian Oil Corporation granted agency of kerosene oil in Vidisha District to the plaintiffs in the name of Vidisha Auto Service for petrol, diesel and mobioil. Subsequently another retail outlet was opened in Dholkhedi which business was done in the sub-partnership with the name of Vidisha Auto Sales and Service. Initially, the partnership was constituted of two partners, namely; Ramswaroop Sharma, predecessor in title of the present plaintiffs. and defendant No. I i.e. defendant/respondent No. 1.

3. After about 14/15 years, there was some dispute between the partners and they mutually agreed to distribute assets of partnership and the dece














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top