J.G.CHITRE
Kailash Chandra Trivedi – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank Ltd. – Respondent
1. Appellant has claimed possession of the premises admeasuring 2580 sq.ft. area in possession of the respondents situated on Maharani Road (hereinafter referred to as 'the suit premises' for convenience). He averred that the appellant is having the Joint Hindu Family consisting of himself, his mother, wife, two sons and two daughters. He averred that all these members have a join Hindu Family running a business as well as he himself, his wife, sons engaged in business independently also. According to his averment his son Sunil Trivedi is running a business under the style "Eharat Timber Trading Company". Other son Sanjay is running a steel business under the style "Sanjay Steel". His wife Chandrabala Trivedi is having partnership firm with Kailash Gupta under Style "Kailash & Kailash".
2. According to the averments of the plaintiff-appellant he does not have proper place for having the offices and that is the case also with other family member. Therefore, all the family members have scattered offices. It is the averment of the appellant that they all want to come together in one building so as to make them convenient to go for trade and, therefore, the suit premises in poss
1. Sitaram & another v. Ramkumar & another = (1978 (1) MPWN 490)
3. Meenal Eknath Kshirsagar (Mrs) v. Traders & Agencies and another; = (1996) 5 SCC 344
4. Shri Mathur i.e. Prativa Devi (Smt.) v. T. V. Krishnan; = (1996) 5 SCC 353.
5. Sarvate T.E. v. Nemichand = 1965 JLJ 973
6. D.N. Sanghavi & Sons v. Ambalal Tribhuwan Das
7. Mattulal v, Radhelal; = 1975 JLJ 1
8. S.J. Ehenezer v. Velayudhan and others: = AIR 1998 SC 746
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.