2000 (1) JLJ 208
D.M. Dharmadhikari and S.K Kulshrestha, JJ.
Ashok Kumar Tripathi v. Union of India and others
W.P.No. 2262 of 1999; against the order of stay passed by Division Bench made subject matter in Special Leave to Appeal
(Civil) No. 8334 of 1999; Decided on 17.12.1999.
(2) Constitution of India -- Art. 243D (2) -- providers for horizontal reservation for amongst the reserved seats -- it is to the extent of 1/3rd for women belonging to scheduled castes/scheduled tribes. [Para 9]
(3) Constitution of India -- Art. 243D(3) -- provides for horizontal reservation to the extent of 1/3rd of seats to women by rotation -- including women of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. [Para 9]
(4) Constitution of India -- Art. 243D(4) proviso I -- reservation for the offices of chairpersons is left to State Legislature -- 1st proviso permits certain number of seats to be reserved for reserved categories. [Para 10]
(5) Constitution of India -- Art. 243D (4) proviso II -- mandates horizontal reservation of not less than 1/3rd for women including women belonging to SC/ST categories. [Para 10]
(6) Constitution of India -- Art. 243D (4) proviso III -- permits allotment of seats of reserved category by rotation. [Para 10]
(7) Constitution of India -- Art. 243D(6) -- enables State Legislature to make provision for reservation of seats in panchayats or offices of chairpersons -- it is in relation to other backward classes. [Para 10]
(8) Constitution of India--Art. 243K (4)--State Legislature has been empowered to make law in connection with Panchayat election. [Para 10]
(9) Constitution of India--Arts. 243M and 244 (1) and (2)--Art. 243M is for the purpose of applicability of part IX to ‘scheduled areas‘ referred to in Art. 244(1). [Para 11]
(10) Constitution of India -- Arts. 243-O, 243ZG and 226 -- bar of entertaining election disputes by High Court -- cannot be read to curtail constitutional power of High Court under Art. 226 -- election should not be interdicted on ground of some infraction of rule, etc. -- inherent defect or breach of law can still be interfered with. (1985) 4 SCC 689 and AIR 1999 SC 1723 followed. - [Para 29]
(11) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- S. 129-E (as inserted in 1997) -- Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act. 1996 -- S. 4(g) -- both the provisions -- are parimateria in every respect. [Para 22]
(12) Constitution of India -- Art. 14 - does not envisage equal treatment of unequals n it permits protective treatment to deprived classes of citizens. [Para 36]
(13) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- S. 129-E -- reservation -- principle of proportionate representation based on population of reserved categories has been adhered to -- departure has been made from it in giving them larger share of self governance. AIR 1993 SC 477 and W.P. No. 1013/96 distinguished. [Para 36]
(14) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- S. 129-E -- reservation -ascertained from last census -- total reservation not exceeding 50% -d`reservation having sanction of Constitution -- Court will not see each and every case. [Para 36]
(15) Legislature -- members of -- they are best judges in policy matters -they are closer to society. [Para 37]
(16) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- S. 129-E -- more than 50% of reservation in categories including scheduled tribes in scheduled area 100% reservation for chairpersons in those areas -- is legal. (1994) Supp. (1) SCC 324 followed. W.P. No. 4432/94 relied on. [Para 47]
(17) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- S. 129-E -- reservation of scheduled caste, scheduled tribes, women and backward classes -- being 44% at Stale level not high hence neither arbitrary nor excessive. [Para 52]
(18) Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 -- S. 4 (g) provisos I and II -- expression ‘communities‘ used in main clause (g) -- means scheduled castes and scheduled tribes only -- there is no inner confliet between the main provision and two provisos. [Para 56]
(19) Constitution of India -- part IX and IXA -- Presidential Order, 1977 -- Cl. 3 -- introduction of chapters IX and IXA to the Constitution -- rules out the contention that Presidential Order is old -- formation of new districts in M.P. -- does not change position as per Cl. 3. [Para 58]
Per S.K. Kulshrestha..J.:
(20) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (M.P.) -- S. 199-E -- Constitution of1ndia -- parts IX and IXA -- reservation of more than 50% should he made in exceptional cases -- reservation of 25% of GBC is outer limit. [Paras (1) & (2)]
¼1½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq-243?k ¼1½&mica/k esa vkjf{kr çoxZ ds vkuqikfrd çfrfuf/kRo dk fl)kar viuk;k x;k gSa&;g fdlh {ks= esa mldh tula[;k ij vk/kkfjr LFkkuksa ij mUgsa vkj{k.k nsus ds fy, gSaA ¿iSjk 8 ¼2½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243?k ¼2½&vkjf{kr LFkkuksa ds e/; leLrjh; vkj{k.k micaf/kr gSa&vuqlwfpr tkfr;ksaA tutkfr;ksa dh efgykvksa ds fy, ;g 1@3 dh lhek rd gSaA ¿iSjk 9 ¼3½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243?k ¼3½&efgykvksa ds fy, pØkuqØe }kjk ,d&frgkbZ dh lhek rd leLrjh; vkj{k.k micaf/kr gS&vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj vuqlwfpr tutkfr dh efgyk,¡ muds varxZr gSaA ¿iSjk 9 ¼4½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243?k ¼4½ ijarqd 1&v/;{kksa ds inksa ds fy, vkj{k.k jkT; fo/kku&eaMy ij NksM+k x;k gS&çFke ijarqd }kjk vkjf{kr çoxks± ds fy, fuf‘pr LFkku vkjf{kr fd;k tkuk vuqKkr gSaA ¿iSjk 10 ¼5½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243?k ¼4½ ijarqd 2&vuqlwfpr tkfr tutkfr dh efgykvksa dks lfEefyr djrs gq, efgykvksa ds fy, de&ls&de ,d&frgkbZ leLrjh; vkj{k.k vkKkid gSA ¿iSjk 10 ¼6½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243?k ¼4½ ijarqd 3&vkjf{kr laoxZ ds LFkkuksa dk vkcaVu pØkuqØe esa vuqKkr gSA ¿iSjk 10 ¼7½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq-243?k ¼6½&iapkrksa esa LFkku vFkok v/;{kksa dk in vkjf{kr djus ds fy, mica/k fojfpr djus ds fy, jkT; fo/kku&eaMy dks le{kerk çnku dh xbZ gS&;g vU; fiNM+s oxks± ds laca/k esa gSA ¿iSjk 10 ¼8½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243V ¼4½&jkT fo/kku&eaMy dks iapk;r fuokZpu ds laca/k esa fof/k fufeZr djus ds fy, l‘kDr fd;k x;k gSA ¿iSjk 10 ¼9½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243 M rFkk 244¼1½] ,oa ¼2½ vuq- 243 M] vuq- 244¼1½ rFkk ¼2½ esa ;Fkk fufnZ"V Hkkx o ^vuqlwfpr {ks=ksa* dks ykxw gksus ds ç;kstu ds fy, gSA ¿iSjk 11 ¼10½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq- 243 .k] 243 ;N rFkk 226&mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuokZpu fookn xzg.k fd, tkus dk otZu&vuq- 226 ds v/khu mPp U;k;ky; dks lkafo/kkfud ‘kfDr de fd, tkus ds :i esa fuoZpu ugha fd;k tk ldrk&fuokZpu ij vk{ksi fu;e vkfn ds fdlh mYya?ku ds vk/kkj ij ugha gksuk pkfg,&rnfi] varfuZfgr nks"k vFkok fof/k ds Hkax dh n‘kk esa gLr{ksi fd;k tk ldrk gSA ¼1985½ 4 ,l lh 689 rFkk , vkb vkj 1999 ,l lh 172 vuqlfjrA ¿iSjk 29 ¼11½ iapk;r jkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-ç-½&/kkjk 129&M- ¼1997 esa ;Fkk var%LFkkfir½&iapkr mica/k ¼vuqlwfpr {ks=ksa ij foLrkj½ vf/kfu;e] 1996&/kkjk 4 ¼N½&nksuksa mica/k&çR;sd igys ls leku fo"k;d gSA ¿iSjk 22 ¼12½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&vuq-14&vlekuksa esa leku O;ogkj ifjdfYir ugha gSa&blesa ukxfjdksa ds oafpr oxks± dks laj{k.k dk O;ogkj vuqKkr gSA ¿iSjk 36 ¼13½ iapk;r jkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-ç-½&/kkjk 129M-&vkj{k.k&vkjf{kr çoxks± dh tula[;k ij vk/kkfjr vkuqikfrd çfrfuf/kRo ds fl)kar dk ikyu fd;k x;k gS&blls fopyu] mudks Lok;r ‘kklu dk c`grj va‘k nsus esa fd;k x;k gSA , vkb vkj 1993 ,l lh 477 rFkk fjV ;kfpdk Ø-1013@96 çHksfnrA ¿iSjk 36 ¼14½ iapk;r jkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-ç-½&/kkjk 129M-&vkj{k.k&fiNyh tux.kuk ij ls vfHkfuf‘pr&dqy vkj{k.k 50% ls vf/kd ugha&vkj{k.k dks lafo/kku dh eatwjh&Uk;ky; çR;sd ekeys ij fopkj ugha djsxkA ¿iSjk 36 ¼15½ fo/kku&eaMy&ds lnL;x.k&uhfrxr ekeyksa esa loksZPp; U;k;k/kh‘k gS&os lekt ds fudVrj gSaA ¿iSjk 37 ¼16½ iapk;r jkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-ç-½&/kkjk 129M-&vuqlwfpr {ks= esa vuqlwfpr tutkfr;ksa dks lfEefyr djrs gq, çoxks± ds fy, 50% ls vf/kd vkj{k.kμ {ks=ksa esa v/;{kksa ds fy, 100% vkj{k.k Ⓢ/k gSaA ¼1994½ lIyh- ¼1½ ,l lh lh 324 vuqlfjrA fjV ;kfpdk Ø- 4432@94 voyafcrA ¿iSjk 47 ¼17½ iapk;r jkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-ç-½&/kkjk 129&M-&vuqlwfpr tkfr;ksa] vuqlwfpr tutkfr;ksa efgykvksa rFkk fiNM+s oxks± dk vkj{k.k&jkT Lrj ij 40% gksus ls vf/kd ugha gSa blfy, u euekuk gS vkSj u vR;f/kdA ¿iSjk 52 ¼18½ iapk;r mica/k ¼vuqlwfpr {ks=ksa ij foLrkj½ vf/kfu;e] 1996&/kkjk 4 ¼N½ ijarqd 1 rFkk 2&eq[; [kaM ¼N½ esa ç;qDr vfHkO;fDr ^leqnk;*&vFkZ dsoy vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj vuqlwfpr tutkfr gSa&eq[; mica/k vkSj nksuksa ijarqdksa esa dksbZ varfojks/k ugha gSA ¿iSjk 56 ¼19½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&v/;k; 9 rFkk 9d&jk"Vªifr vkns‘k] 1977&[kaM 3&lafo/kku ds v/;k; 9 rFkk 9d dh çLrkouk ls&;g ladFku oftZr gks tkrk gS fd jk"Vªifr vkns‘k iqjkuk gSa&e/; çns‘k esa u, ftyksa dk xBu&[kaM 3 ds vuqlkj fLFkfr ifjofrZr ugha gksrhA ¿iSjk 58 U;k- ,l-ds- dqyJs"V% ¼20½ iapk;r jkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-ç-½&/kkjk 129 M-&Hkkjr dk lafo/kku&Hkkx 9 rFkk 9d&50% ls vf/kd vkj{k.k vkiokfnd ekeyksa esa fd;k tkuk pkfg,&vU fiNM+s oxks± ds fy, 25% dk vkj{k.k ckgjh lhek gSA ¿iSjk ¼1½ ,oa ¼2½
Dharmadhikari, J.--This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India shall decide the connected batch of petitions Nos. W.P. 2059/99 (Ravi Thakur & others v. Union of India & others), W.P. 1984/99 (Rajendra Soni v. The State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2080/99 (Ajay Shrivastava v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2082/99 Thakur Dutt Sharma & others v. State of M.P & others, W.P. 2084/99 (Kanchan Singh Chouhan v. State of M.P. & others). W.P. 2085/99 (Dilawar Khan & others v. State of M.P. & others), WP 2087/99 (Muinuddin v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2124/99 (Jagdish Prasad Jaiswal & others) v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2131/99 (Chhotebl Choudhary v. State of M:P.), W.P. 2152/99 (Sita Prasad Tripathi v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2154/99 (Mithilesh Kumar Mishra & others v. Union of India & others), W.P. 2159/99 (Bhagwat Prasad Mahere v. State of MP & others. W.P. 2161/99 (Pooran Patak v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2184/99) (Govind Lal Sahu v. State of M.P. & others) W.P. 2222/99 (Ganesh Singh Patel & others v. State of M.P. & 2 others), W.P. 2242/99 (Ram Babu Dhakad & another v. State of M.P. others), W.P. 2245/99 (Lakhanlal & another v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2248/99 (Gopal Prasad Chandra & others v. State of MP. & others), W.P. 2250/99 (Laxminarayan Gour v. State of M.P. & another). W.P. 2254/99 (Pulin Biswas & 9 others v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2255/99 (Totaram Mahajan & another v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2256/99 (Soochana Patel v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2262/99 (Ashok Kumar Tripathi v. Union of India), W.P. 2266/99 (Omkar Yadav & others v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2270/99 (Vijay Bahadur Singh v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2271/99 (Ratan Singh v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2272/99 (Bharat Yadav v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2273/99 (Hari Om Chouksey v. The Union of India), W.P. 2274/99 (Kashiram & others v. The Union of India & others), W.P. 2276/99 (Rajendra Patel v. Union of India & others), W.P. 2277/99 (Mohan Lal Shrivas v. Union.of India & others), W.P. 2278/99 (Sardar Raminder" Singh Kalra v. Union of India & others), W.P. 2279/99 (Chandra Bhan Yadava v. The State of M.P.), W.P. 2280/99 (Netram Yadav v. The Union of India & others), W.P. 2281/99 (Shakti Singh v. Union of India'& others), W.P. 2282/99 (Arvind Chouhan & others v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2285/99 (Raghvendra Singh & others v. The Union of India & others), W.P. 2290/99 (Vinod Kumar Guru v. The State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2300/99 (Naresh Tiwari & another v. State of M.P. & another), W.P. 2309/99 (Uma Rao Singh Maurya & others v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2310/99 (Deoraj Singh v. State of M.P. & another), W.P. 2311/99 (Ram Kishore & two others v. State of M.P. & 2 others), W.P. 2313/99 (Arjun Mahto v. State of M.P. & another), W.P. 2319/99 (Brijlal & others v. State of M.P.), W.P. 2329/99 (Ratan Chand Jain & others v. State of M.P. & another), W.P. 2339/99 (Kedar patel v. State of M.P. 3 others), W.P. 2345/99 (Ramcharan Ahirwar & another v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2346/99 (Sheikh Qamaruddin & others v. The Union of India & others), W.P. 2353/99 (Kedar Patel v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2355/99 (Nand Kishor Shrivastava v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2371/99 (Kailash Das Swami & others v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2372/99 (Jasvindra Pratap Singh & others v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2373/99 (Smt. Moorti Bai v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 23/4/99 (Shyam Kumar Mishra v. The State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2380/99 (Balwan Singh Rathore v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2384/99 (Mahendra Kumar Arse v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2385/99 (Balram Patel v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2409/99 (Raghwendra Singh & others v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2420/99 (Ramdin Sharma v. State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2440/99 (Smt.) Usha Shrivastava & another v. State of M.P. & others, W.P. 2485/99 (Mazboot Singh v. The State of M.P. & others), W.P. 2506/99 (Smt. Maya Awadhiya v. The
3. Anugrah Narain Singh and another v. State of U.P. = [(1996) 6 SCC 303].
4. Keshwanand Bharti v. Union of India = (AIR 1973 SC 1461).
5. K Venkatachalam v. A. Swamickan = (AIR 1999 SC 1723)
6. Lalchand v. State of Haryana = (AIR 1999 P&H 1).
9. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India = (AIR 1993 SC 477).
13. Aniruddh Pd. Shasthri v. State = (1993 RN 304
14. Dr. Chakardhar Paswan v. State of Bihar and others = [(1988) 2 SCC 214]
16. Motor General Traders and another v. State of Andhra Pradesh = (AIR 1984 SC 121)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.