SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 797

TEJ SHANKAR
Mohd. Jameel Khan – Appellant
Versus
Mitthu Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K. Shrivastava for applicants; S.S. Chauhan and A.K. Nagarkar for non-applicants.

ORDER

Tej Shankar, J. -- 1. This revision petition has arisen out of an order dated 23.7.1997 passed by Second Civil Judge Class-II, Vidisha.

2. The facts leading to the petition in short are that: plaintiff -- respondent No.) Mithuthu Lal filed a suit for declaration and injunction alleging that he was the resident of village Basuriya, Tehsil Gyaraspur, Distt, Vidisha and was aged 35 years. He had no son. He had two daughters. He kept his younger daughter Kranti Bai and son-in-law Mahendra Singh at his house for looking after his cultivation on account of his old age. They lived there for 15-16 years. He had certain lands detailed in para 2 of the plaint. His son-in-law Mahendra Singh was living with him, His son-in-law started quarrelling and had also beaten him for sometime. There was an enmity going on. Hence it was difficult for him to live in the village. Defendant No.1 started helping him. Defendants 2 to; 8 were friends of defendant No.1. He had faith on them. He had kept Bhu-Adhikar Pustika with defendant No.1. In May, 1994, defendant No.1 asked him to go to Vidisha to move an application after keeping all the documents of land. As he had full confidence over him, he agreed














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top