SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 150

N.K.JAIN
Deepchand – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.J. Bhojwani for applicants; Girish Desai, Govt. Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. The applicants are aggrieved by the order dated 10.10.1996 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dhar in Cr. Misc. Case No. 200/96 transferring Sessions Trial No. 394/95 from 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Dhar to the Special Judge, Dhar.

2. The accused applicants are facing trial in the Sessions Court, Dhar on the charges under section 306 and 498A of Indian Penal Code. The case was registered at S.T. No. 394/95 and made over for trial to the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge. However, at the fag end of the trial, when 9 prosecution witnesses were already examined, one Suresh Chandra, the father of the deceased on whose report the First Information Report in the case was registered, moved Transfer Application under section 408 CrPC before the Sessions Judge. Some personal allegations were made against the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge (Smt. Jaishree Verma, who now stands transferred to some other Sessions Division). The learned Session Judge by his order impugned, although held that the allegations made against the Presiding Officer were unfounded, but allowed the transfer application in following terms:

"It is well settled principle that 'justice should not only be done, but it should be appeare



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top