S.S.JHA
Aslam Beg Mirdha – Appellant
Versus
Babulal – Respondent
1. The order of this revision shall govern the disposal of Civil Revision No. 1029 of 1996 between Farukh and Ramesh Singh & others.
2. This revision is filed under section 26 of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Both these revision petitions arise out of the order passed in Election Petition under the Act before the District Judge, Guna, .
3. For filing an election petition rules have been framed, which are known as Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Election Petition) Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'). Rule 19 of the Rules provides for revision. Rule 19 is reproduced below :-
" 19. Revision.-- (1) No petition by way of revision shall lie against any interlocutory order passed by the Judge.
(2) At the time of presentation of the petition for revision under subsection (2) of section 26 against the decision of the Judge, the petitioner shall deposit with the High Court a sum of Rs. 250 as security for the costs of the revision. If the provisions of this rules are not complied with the High Court shall dismiss the petition."
4. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 19 provides that at the time of presentation of the petition for revis
1. Kailash Narayan v. Namdar and others
2. Ravi Thakur v. Shiv Shankar Patel and others
4. Aoltemesh Rain v. Chandulal Chandrakar and others
7. Babulal & another v. State of M.P. & others
3. Charml Lal Sahu v. Nandkis/Zore Bhatt and others
5. Radheshyam slo Nandlalji Patidar v. Jagdish slo Gangaram Patidar
6. Harish Chandra and another v. Triloki Singh. = AIR 1957 SC 444
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.