V.K.AGARWAL
Rawal Singh – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Griha Nirman Mandal – Respondent
1. Both these revisions arise from the impugned orders dated 30.10.1993 passed in Civil Suit No. 42-A/1984 (Civil Revision No. 578/93) and Civil Suit No. 40-A of 1984 (Civil Revision No. 584/93) by n Additional District Judge, Balaghat whereby the application for execution of the ex parte decrees passed in the said civil suits was held to be time-barred and was accordingly dismissed.
2. Decrees in Civil Suit No. 42-N84 & Civil Suit No. 40-N84 were passed in favour of the applicant whereby a mandatory injunction to the effect against the non-applicant/defendant" was passed that the non-applicant" would allot an MIG type house to the applicant whenever it is constructed, at the price, as prevailing for the said type of house in the year 1978. The ex-parte decrees to the above effect passed on 21st June, 1985 were sought to be executed by an applications for execution dated 20.1.1993, which were held to be time-barred and dismissed by the impugned-order.
3. It was urged before the executing Court that the judgment-debtors/non-applicant" had filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. for setting-aside the ex parte decrees passed, as-above, which application was dismissed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.