R.P.AWASTHY, RAJEEV GUPTA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Budhram – Respondent
R.P. Awasthy, J.--1. It is a reference made under section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code for confirming the sentence of death awarded to the accused. The accused has also filed an appeal which has been registered as Criminal Appeal No. 1128/95 against the finding of holding him guilty for committing murders of his father Kunkuram, Step-mother Ravibai, Stepbrothers Nankua, Chatua and Shankarlal and Step-sisters Jugnabai and Muliabai and recommendation for sentencing him to death.
2. It has not been disputed by the accused that Kumkuram (since deceased) had left about 20 years prior to the date of incident his married wife Hirabai, daughter Urmila and son accused Budhram at village Basti Baradwar where they used to reside. At that time the daughter of Kunkuram to wit Urmila was aged about 5 years and his son, accused Budhram was aged about 3 years. It had also not been disputed that Kunkuram had kept Ravibai, as his wife and had gone for earning his livelihood alongwith Ravibai towards Allahabad. The mother of the accused brought up the accused and his sister by cultivating the land belonging to Kunkuram. It was she who performed marriage ceremonies of Urmilabai and subsequen
1. Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka = (AIR 1983 SC 446)
2. State of M.P. v. Premlal @Jarooha = (1987 JLJ 102
4. Suresh v. State of U.P. = (AIR 1981 SC at 1122)
5. Kathi Odhabhai Bhimabhai and others v. State of Gujarat = (AIR 1993 SC at page 1193)
3. Vadivelu Thevar v. State of Madras = (AIR 1957 SC at 614: 619)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.