SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 307

C.K.PRASAD
Bhagsingh – Appellant
Versus
Sunita – Respondent


Advocates:
Jai Singh for applicants; Girish Desai, Govt. Advocate for respondents.

ORDER

1. The petitioners have filed this application against the order dated 29.10.1994 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajgarh (Biaora) in Criminal Case No. 936/92 whereby the prayer made by the petitioners that the learned Magistrate has no jurisdiction to entertain the case, on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction, has been rejected The Learned Magistrate has also directed that the prayer made by the petitioners for dispensing their personal attendance, shall be considered, after they appear before him.

2. I have heard the counsel for the petitioners as also Shri G. Desai, Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the M.A. No.2 and this application is being disposed of at the motion hearing stage itself.

3. N.A. No.1 Sunita filed a complaint in the Court of C.J.M. Rajgarh stating therein that she is the resident of Rajgarh and the accused persons namely petitioner No.1 is her husband, petitioner No.2 is her father-in-law, petitioners Nos. 3 and 4 are her uncle-in-law, petitioner No.5 is her mother-in-law, petitioner No.6 is her aunt-in-law and petitioner No.7 is her sister-in-law and all of them are residents of Panipat in the State of Haryana. The complaina















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top