SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 225

T.N.SINGH
Sujan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lalsahab – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K. Lahoti for appellant; K.K. Singh for respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT

Dr. T.N. Singh, J. -- 1. Defendant has appealed, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree allowing plaintiff's claim and cancelling the sale-deed dated 13.6.1984. Plaintiff/respondent had impugned that sale-deed being void as consideration, though stated as paid there under, had not been paid in fact.

2. During the course of hearing of the appeal, prayer is made by defendant/appellant for leave to amend the written statement by adding para 12 to include the averment that without prejudice to other defence claimed if the Court finds and concludes that consideration had not in fact been paid, then, direction be made to the plaintiff/respondent to accept the same because merely on the ground of non-payment of consideration, the sale-deed could not be cancelled. That prayer is seriously opposed for valid reason, but that is to be disposed of at the outset before dealing with the appeal on merits.

3. Shri K.K. Singh, counsel appearing for the respondent, cited Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. (AIR 1977 SC680) to submit that an entirely new case cannot be set up by way of amendment as would destroy any valuable right accrued to the plaintiff. Their Lordships held in that case th


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top