K.L.ISSRANI, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
S. S. Koshal – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
D.M. Dharmadhikari, J. -- 1. The petitioner was posted during the year 1980 as Branch Manager at Mohgaon under the State Bank of India. He challenges in this petition the impugned order dated 8th May, 1984 whereby the Chief General Manager (respondent No.2) in his capacity as disciplinary authority has imposed on him punishment of removal from service after a disciplinary enquiry for charges contained in the charge-sheet (Annexure-A)
2. An Enquiry Officer was appointed, who, after conducting the enquiry, submitted his enquiry report (Annexure-B). The Enquiry Officer held that charge Nos. 1 and 5 were proved against the petitioner, but charge Nos: 2, 3, 4 aad 6 wcre not proved. .
3. The disciplinary authority in his final order, imposing punishment, dated 8th May, 1984 (Annexure-C) agreed with the findings of the Enquiry Officer in respect of charge Nos. 1 and 5 as proved and 3 and 4 as not proved. He, however, disagreed with the finding of the Enquiry Officer with respect to charge Nos. 2 and 6 and held that charge No.2 was fully proved and charge No.6 was partly proved. Based on the report of the Enquiry Officer and the order of the disciplinary authority disagreeing partly wi
2. Brij Nandan Kaushal v. State of U.P. = AIR 1988 SC 908
6. S.N. Mukerjee v. Union of India = AIR 1990 SC 1984
7. Ram Dhin Gupta v. State Bank of India = 1989 MPLJ 552
8. R.P. Bhatt v. Union of India = AIR 1986 SC 1040
9. Ramchander v. Union of India = AIR 1986 SC 1173
10. State of Madras v. A.R. Shrinivasan = (AIR 1966 SC 1827)
11. Som Daft v. Union of India = (AIR 1969 SC 414)
12. Tarachand v. Delhi Municipality = (AIR 1977 SC 567)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.