P.C.PATHAK
Electric Construction and Equipment Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Permali Wallace Ltd. – Respondent
P.C. Pathak, J. -- 1. The defendant has filed this appeal under order 43, rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order rejecting an application under order 9, rule 13, CPC to set aside ex-parte decree dated 20.4.1983.
2. On 1.10.1981, the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,17,519.22 representing unpaid price of the goods together with interest @ 18% per annum, godown charges @ 2½% per annum. The plaintiff also claimed interest pendente lite and future both, godown charges at the aforesaid rate till realisation together with costs.
3. On 25.6.1982, the Court noted that the summons issued to the defendant were not received back. Therefore, the Court ordered issue of fresh summons in addition to by registered post. Order-sheet dated 5.8.1982, shows that the summons were not issued since the process fee and registration charges were not paid. On 20.9.1982, the Court noted that the summons sent through ordinary post was not back, and was therefore awaited, and the summons through registered post had not been issued. Therefore, the Court ordered issue of summons through registered post on the same day. The suit was posted for settlement of issues on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.