SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 324

V.D.GYANI
Kaniram – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Jaisingh for applicants; Desai, Panel Lawyer for State.

ORDER

V.D. Gyani. J. -- 1. All these bail petitions u/s. 439 CrPC have a common thread, although they relate to crimes registered at various police stations against different persons. All of them, barring only M.Cr.C. 1200/90 alone, are repeaters, having lost in their bid, to get bail on merits. The common thread that runs through these petitions is the common ground of delay raised in all these petitions, and stressed by all the learned counsel appearing in these cases. Trials in all these cases have been delayed for want of committal orders which in turn have been delayed or deferred for non-production of reports, either from the Chemical Examiners or from the State Forensic Laboratory with the net result that the petitioners undoubtedly accused of serious crimes, like murder and dacoity, are suffering pretrial incarceration. They have a point-when they ask, how long and after all how long they should wait for filing of reports from State Forensic Science Laboratory, the passing of committal orders at times very conveniently and comfortably deferred, by the magistrates, at the behest of some of the sessions judges, putting a self-serving assumptive interpretations of Criminal Cou






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top