Dr. T. N. Singh, J. -1. This order shall govern disposal of M.P. Nos. 1466 and 1467, both of 1989. Both petitioners have a common grievance and indeed, respondents have raised a common plea in the instant petitions claiming that they are not entitled to any relief from this Court on the basis of a single legal contention raised in return filed in both petitions which is forcefully and very competently pressed by Shri Mittal.

2. Petitioner Sushil Kumar of M.P.No.1466 of 1989 was appointed under Order, Annexure P/1, dated 26.10.1988 on being selected in the test conducted for that purpose in the post of constable/Lineman. The other petitioner Virendra Singh ofM.P.No.1467 of 1989, it is not disputed, was appointed as a Naik/Radio Operator, vide order dated 23.4.1988. It is also not disputed that service of both petitioners under orders of appointment are to be governed by the provisions of Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, for short, the' Act' and the Rules framed there under in 1955, for short, 1955 Rules' or the 'Rules.' Both petitioners are aggrieved as their services have been terminated, in the case of Sushil Kumar, under Order, Annexure P/3, dated 8.11.1989 and in the