SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 645

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, T.K.THOMMEN
MANAGEMENT OF M. S. NALLY BHARAT ENGINEERING CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.- Special leave is granted.

2. This appeal from an order of the Patna High Court raises an important question as to the scope of Section 33-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act).

3. The facts can be quite shortly stated: The appellant-company is mainly engaged in construction of coal washeries on contract basis in different collieries and also doing allied and incidental work. Shivaji Prasad Sinha - respondent 4 was a Senior Supervisor in the companys establishment at Dhanbad. It is said that he was caught red-handed when carrying 55 pieces of electromagnetic clutch plates kept concealed in the tool box of his scooter. The management held domestic enquiry into the incident and found him guilty of committing theft. He was accordingly dismissed from service. The dispute arising therefrom was referred under Section 10(l)(c) of the Act to Labour Court, Dhanbad for adjudication. The Labour Court registered the case as Reference Case No. 4 of 1988and issued notice to the parties. The parties entered appearance and filed their respective pleadings. When the matter was thus pending consideration the respondent seems to have written to the governmen

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top