SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI, S.K.DUBEY, R.C.LAHOTI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Dugdha Mahasangh Sahkari – Respondent
S.K. Dubey, J. -- 1. The two petitions have come up before this Full Bench on a reference by a Division Bench of this Court constituted by one of us (S.K. Dubey,J.) and Shri S.K. Chawla, J. Before the Division Bench, during the course of hearing, a preliminary objection was raised by the respondents that the respondent No.1, the Madhya Pradesh Dugdha Maha Sangh Sahkari Maryadit, Bhopal, was registered on 13.5.1980 by the Registrar, M.P. Co-operative Societies, Bhopal (for short, the 'Registrar') under section 9 of the M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (for short, the' Act'), and was classified as 'Federal Society' vide registration certificate (Annexure R/4), whereby bye- laws (Annexure R/5) were also approved under section 9 of the Act by the Registrar. The respondent No.2 was registered as a Co- operative Society on 4.7.1983 and classified as 'Central Society,' which also had its own approved bye-laws, Annexure RI7. The two societies are not rendering any important public service nor are carrying out governmental activity and governmental functions of vital importance; therefore, the respondents are not "the State" within the dynamics of Article 12 of the Constitution of
1. Chandra Mohan Khanna v. NCERT
6. Sri Konaseema Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. v. N. Seetharama Raju
8. Central Inland Water Transport Corpn. v. Brojonath Ganguly & another = AIR 1986 SC 1571
10. Ramswaroop v. State of M.P., 1976 JLJ 293
11. Sri Anadi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandasjiswami Suvama Jayanti Mahotsav Trustv. V.R. Rudani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.