P.P.NAOLEKAR
Vishnu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Liladhar – Respondent
P.P. Naolekar, J. -- 1. This order shall also govern disposal of M.C.C. No. 4/93 (Vinod Kumar v. Liladhar & ors), M.C.C. No. 5/93 (Smt. Gayatri Devi v. Liladhar) and M.C.C. No. 6/93 (Kapoor Chand v. Liladhar). The question involved in these petitions is of general public importance and is of every day occurrence, and therefore, I requested Shri Deepak Verma and Shri Ravindra Shrivastava, Advocates, to appear as Amicus Curiae. I must record my thanks for their able assistance to this Court at a short notice in-spite of their pre-occupation and responsibilities. The question is whether the High Court has power and jurisdiction to transfer a case from Jabalpur Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to Bilaspur Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal constituted by the State Government for a particular area by notification issued under section 165 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, exercising powers under section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Arguments of the counsel were spread over on three aspects. Whether the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred as the' Act'), with the rules framed there under, is a self-contained code and therefore, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has applicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.