SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(MP) 256

R.D.SHUKLA
Gangadhar – Appellant
Versus
Shantaram Lokre – Respondent


Advocates:
Dagaonkar for applicant; C.B. Patne for non-applicant.

ORDER

R.D. Shukla, J.-- 1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.9.92 of the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore, whereby the decree of eviction has been passed in favour of the non-applicant-landlord.

2. The brief history or the case is that Smt. Radhabai, the predecessor in interest and mother of present non-applicant filed application under section 23-A of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') with the assertions that she is a widow and that she bona fide requires the house for the residence of her son and grandsons.

3. The tenant (applicant herein) contested the claim and pleaded that the landlord wants to enhance the rent and she demanded it to be raised to Rs. 100/per month; and that she does not require the house for the residence of herself or her family members. It was also pleaded that the need is not genuine.

4. During the pendency of this application, Smt. Radhabai died and the present non-applicant Shantaram, who is the son of Radhabai was brought on record,

5. The present non-appellant was a Government servant at the time of his substitution as plaintiff in the case, therefore, he pleaded that as a Go





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top