SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 54

S.N.AGGARWAL
Rajendra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashish Pathak for petitioner
R.B. Patel for respondent No.1, Punit Shroti, Panel Lawyer for State.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant is an unfortunate father who lost his married daughter, who died an unnatural death within four years of her marriage. A case under section 304-B IPC was registered against the husband of his daughter and other members of his family on the complaint of the appellant. In that case, the accused persons being in-laws of the daughter of the appellant were acquitted by the trial Court vide judgment dated 26.9.2001 in Sessions Trial case No. 22912000. While acquitting the accused persons, the trial Court ordered for registration of a criminal case against the appellant under section 193, 194 and 195 IPC for giving false evidence to procure conviction of the accused persons in a case registered against them under section 304B IPC. The appellant on being tried for the offence under section 193, 194 and 195 IPC has been convicted by the Sessions Court for the offence under section 195 IPC vide impugned judgment dated 1.5.2003 in Sessions Trial case No. 180/2002. Aggrieved from his conviction, the appellant has filed this appeal seeking setting aside of his conviction.

2. Heard learned counsel for the both the parties for final disposal of this appeal.

3. Mr. V. K. Sax









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top