SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 481

SHANTANU KEMKAR, S.K.SETH
Chhenu @ Yunus – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rahul Vijayvargiya for petitioner
A.K. Kutumbale, Additional Advocate General, for respondents.

ORDER

S.K. Seth, J. -- 1. The short question which this petition raises for our decision is whether the order of detention passed against and served on the petitioner Chhenu alias Yunus is sustainable under section 3 (2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter called the 'Act'). The answer to this question would naturally depend upon a fair and reasonable construction of the relevant clause of the said section.

2.The District Magistrate, Ujjain, passed the detention order on the March 3, 2010 directing that the petitioner should be detained. The order recites that the District Magistrate was satisfied that it was necessary to detain the petitioner with a view to prevent him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. This order was served on the petitioner on March 3, 2010. The grounds of detention were served on 4.3.2010. After getting positive report from the Advisory Board, State Government passed the Order dated April 19, 2010 under section 12 of the Act confirming the detention order for a period of twelve months vide Annexure P-6.

3. At the outset, it may be stated that there is dispute about the date of arrest of detenu. According to learned














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top