1. Heard on the question of admission.

2. In the instant petition filed as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner has alleged about various financial irregularities alleged to have been committed by the Tehsildar who is arrayed as respondent No.4 in the writ petition. The petitioner inter alia has prayed for a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take suitable action against the respondent No.4.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though complaints have been made against the respondent No.4 to various authorities, yet no action has been taken against him.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner we are of the view that allegations made by the petitioner are required to be investigated before expressing any opinion on such allegations. In this regard it would be relevant to notice that the Government has created various authorities under the Special Act to investigate and also to suggest appropriate action against such public servant or officer who has misused or abused his position and as such is guilty of corruption. In this regard, it would be relevant to take note of the provisions of the M.P. Lokayukt Evan UP- Lokayukt Adhiniyam, 1981 (herein