SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 238

K.S.CHAUHAN
Onkar Prasad Loni – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N Shukla for applicants;
Akhilendra Singh, Govt. Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicant being aggrieved by the order dated 14.9.2009 passed by the ASJ, Kotma, District Anooppur in Criminal Revision No. 687/09 arising out of order dated 4.9.09 passed by the JMFC, Kotma in Criminal Case No. 956/09, whereby the Lower Revisional Court has set aside the order passed by the trial Court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 2.8.2009 the applicants had gone to the forest by motorcycle bearing registration No. MP 18 G/0690 and killed two ducks and one crane by using breach loading gun. Gun and vehicle have been seized during the course of the investigation. An application for releasing the vehicle on Supurdnama was moved by the applicants, which was allowed by the JMFC, Kotma. Being aggrieved by that order, respondent-State prefer-erred revision before the Lower Revisional Court, which was allowed and the order of trial Court was set aside. Being aggrieved by the impugned order, the instant revision has been preferred by the applicants on the grounds mentioned in the memo of revision.

3. Shri D.N. Shukla, learned counsel for the appl







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top