SHANTANU KEMKAR
Mahesh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Aggrieved by the order dated 23.3 .2010 (Annexure P-17) passed by the Competent Authority of the State Government allowing the revision filed by the 2nd respondent against the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, the petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2. The brief facts necessary for disposal of his petition are that petitioner was appointed on the post of Panchayat Karmi vide resolution dated 12.4.2006 passed by the Gram Panchayat Walka, Tahsil Bhikangaon, District Khargone on the basis of the majority. The said resolution of appointment of the petitioner as Panchayat Karmi was assailed by the 2nd respondent before the Collector Khargone. The Collector Khargone vide order dated 21.3.2007 (Annexure P-9) recorded the finding that the resolution of the Panchayat appointing the petitioner as Panchayat Karmi is legal and just at the same time he also held that the said resolution Cannot be cancelled by him under the provisions of section 85 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhniyam. He accordingly dismissed the case filed by the 2nd respondent.
3. Aggrieved the 2nd respondent filed a Writ Petition No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.