SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 453

UMA NATH SINGH
Ram Govind and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chanchal Sharma, P.R.Bhave,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS criminal revision impugns the judgment dated 19-12-95 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sidhi in Criminal Appeal No. 9/93, whereby order of conviction of all the applicants under Sections 325/149 and 147, IPC has been affirmed, but while not interfering with a sentence of six months R. I. each under Section 147, IPC, the learned Appellate Court has reduced the sentence of one year R. I. under Sections 325/149, IPC to six months R. I. each. However, the fine amount of Rs. 100/- each, thereunder, has been maintained

( 2. ) AS per narration of facts on record, the incident took place on 5-2-86 at 9 oclock over possession of a disputed land amongst three real brothers namely, accused Yagyasharan (since released on probation) and injured witnesses, Ramvishal (P. W. 1) and Ramsakha (P. W. 2 ). Brijesh (applicant No. 3) is son of accused Yagyasharan and other accused, namely Ram Govind (applicant No. 1), Sambhoo Prasad (applicant No. 2) and Awadhlal (since released on probation) are his brothers-in-law. On the date of occurrence, as per proseuction case, accused applicants were harvesting crops which was prevented by the complainant side. It infuriated the accused w









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top