UMA NATH SINGH
Ram Govind and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
( 1. ) THIS criminal revision impugns the judgment dated 19-12-95 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sidhi in Criminal Appeal No. 9/93, whereby order of conviction of all the applicants under Sections 325/149 and 147, IPC has been affirmed, but while not interfering with a sentence of six months R. I. each under Section 147, IPC, the learned Appellate Court has reduced the sentence of one year R. I. under Sections 325/149, IPC to six months R. I. each. However, the fine amount of Rs. 100/- each, thereunder, has been maintained
( 2. ) AS per narration of facts on record, the incident took place on 5-2-86 at 9 oclock over possession of a disputed land amongst three real brothers namely, accused Yagyasharan (since released on probation) and injured witnesses, Ramvishal (P. W. 1) and Ramsakha (P. W. 2 ). Brijesh (applicant No. 3) is son of accused Yagyasharan and other accused, namely Ram Govind (applicant No. 1), Sambhoo Prasad (applicant No. 2) and Awadhlal (since released on probation) are his brothers-in-law. On the date of occurrence, as per proseuction case, accused applicants were harvesting crops which was prevented by the complainant side. It infuriated the accused w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.