SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 195

ARUN MISHRA
Usha Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.D.Suryavanshi, V.D.Sharma,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Worker on 22-9-97. She is assailing the order of her removal without issuance of show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing issued by Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat. ( 2. ) THE petitioner was appointed after following due selection process as Anganwadi Worker as per order dated 24-9-97 Annexure P-3. She was working at Anganwadi Centre, Udotpura. Petitioner submits that her removal was ordered without issuance of show-cause notice, without conduct of any enquiry, charges were not informed and outrightly she was given the order of

removal. Petitioner further submits that Annexure P-6, memo dated 29-10-96. In para 2 of the said memo as contained in Annexure P-6 the procedure for removal of Anganwadi Workers and Assistants according to which it is necessary that if any Gram Panchayat is aggrieved by the functioning of Anganwadi Worker and Assistant, it has to pass a resolution and send it to the Project Officer and thereupon the Project Officer either himself or through Supervisor has to get the enquiry done into facts within two weeks from the date of receipt of resolution of Gram Panchayat and make a recommendation o















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top