SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 69

ARUN MISHRA
GOKUL PRASAD PATEL – Appellant
Versus
SPECIFIED OFFICER/SDO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.MISHRA, R.L.Ariha, VIVEK RUSIA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE petitioner in the instant writ petition challenges the dismissal of election petition by the S. D. O. as per Order (P-7 ).

( 2. ) PETITIONER preferred election petition under Section 122 of the MP. Panchayat and Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 on the ground of irregularity in the counting and the recounting was held in illegal manner by the Presiding Officer. Respondent Nos. 3, 5 and 7 in the reply before SDO contended that counting was properly held. No written application was filed by the petitioner for recounting. On the prayer made by the petitioner recounting was done, still no change was found. SDO as per order (P-4) in spite of giving finding that no written application was filed before the Presiding Officer seeking recount, ordered the recount as per order dated 4-7-2001 and appointed a Committee of three persons. Recounting has been held and report (P-5) was submitted before the SDO. SDO has dismissed the election petition holding that counting was held properly and result remains the same.

( 3. ) SHRI Vivek Rusia, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that from the report (P-5) of recounting it is clear that on 24 ballot papers out of 28 some












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top