SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 541

RAJENDRA MENON
Yogendra Verma – Appellant
Versus
Dharmendra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.NAIK, M.B.MANGAL, R.D.Jain, Rajeev Raghuvanshi,

Judgment

( 1. ) CHALLENGE in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is made to an order, Annexure P-6, dated 12-2-2004 passed by the Court of Twelfth Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Gwalior by which petitioner has been directed to pay the proper stamp duty on the document (Annexure P-2), an agreement for sale in accordance with provisions of Article 23 to Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. It is the case of the petitioner that the aforesaid direction given for affixing the stamp duty on the document is clearly unsustainable.

( 2. ) PETITIONER had instituted a suit for specific performance of a registered agreement for sale dated 9-8-2000 (Annexure P-2 ). Relief claimed by the petitioner in the suit is to direct the respondents to execute the sale deed in pursuance to the aforesaid agreement and to hand over possession of the property in question. It is the case of the petitioner that written statement was filed and in the written statement (Annexure P-3), defendants/respondents asserted their own possession, so also disputed the agreement to sale. After framing of issues, chief examination under Order XVIII Rule 4, CPC, was submitted and the agreemen















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top