R.V.RAVEENDRAN, K.K.LAHOTI, SHANTANU KEMKAR
Jagdish Prasad Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. – Respondent
( 1. ) THE petitioner claims that he worked as ad-hoc Assistant Teacher between 8-3-1981 to 30-4-1981 and again from 31-8-1981 to 30-44982, that thereafter his services were dispensed with without assigning any reason and without affording any opportunity. He, therefore, filed an Application (O. A No. 967 of 1998) before the M. P. State Administrative Tribunal praying that he may be taken back into service. The said application was dismissed by the Tribunal by order dated 21-5-2002 for the reasons stated in its order passed on the same day in Raghunath Prasad Badgiya v. State of M. P. (O. A. No. 1310/1998 ). The petitioner has challenged the said order of the Tribunal in this writ petition filed on 11-3-2004 with a further prayer that he may be permitted to work in the post of Assistant Teacher with all back-wages and all consequential benefits by regularising his service from the date of initial appointment.
( 2. ) WHEN the said writ petition came up before the Division Bench on 11-8-2004, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if the relief granted by a Division Bench of this Court, by order dated 4-11-2003 in W. P. No. 5238/
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs SURESH KUMAR VERMA
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs DHARAM BIR
A.Umarani Vs Registrar, Co.-operative Societies
M/s.Teri Oat Estates (P) Ltd. Vs U.T., Chandigarh
MOHINI MOHAN CHAKRAVARTY Vs State of West Bengal
BACHAN SINGH Vs State of Punjab
Ramakrishna Kamar Vs State of Karnataka
UNION OF INDIA Vs SECRETARY,MADRAS CIVIL AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS ASSOCIATION
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.