SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 711

SHANTANU KEMKAR
RAJENDRA PRASAD DWIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
ATUL KUMAR DWIVEDI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.L.Patel, Chandrahas Dubey, Harish Agnihotri,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed against the order dated 15th July, 2003 passed by the Ist Additional district Judge, Rewa in Civil Suit No. 63-A/03 whereby the plaintiffs/respondent No. 1 to 3s application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure code (hereinafter referred to as the code) for grant of temporary injunction has been allowed.

( 2. ) IN short the facts are: The plaintiffs/respondent No. 1 to 3 filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the defendant No. 1/appellant and defendant No. 2/respondent No. 4 challenging the sale deed dated 29-5-2003 executed by defendant no. 2 in favour of the defendant No. 1 on various grounds viz it was executed by defendant No. 2 without receiving any consideration from the defendant No. 1 and the defendant No. 2 while executing the sale deed was in the state of intoxication and was unable to understand the contents of the document, the property was ancestral and was sold without there being any legal necessity nor it was sold for the benefit of the estate. The plaintiffs also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code praying therein th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top