SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 666

ARUN MISHRA, SHANTANU KEMKAR
Dr. Hajarilal Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.DWIVEDI, Samdarshi Tiwari,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS appeal valued at Rs. 1,95,72,450/-, has been preferred as M. A. No. 215/2005 under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act against an award passed by First Additional District Judge, Katni in Land Acquisition Case No.

66/2000, 68/2000 and 18/2001 on 6-10-2004. The Court fee which has been paid is Rs. 15/- payable on miscellaneous appeal. An application has been filed under Section 149 of CPC in which prayer has been made that appellant may be allowed to make payment of Court fee at the time of final decision of the appeal on compensation which may be determined. Another application has been filed to convert the miscellaneous appeal into first appeal.

( 2. ) AD valorem Court fee is required to be paid on the valuation made in the appeal, of which enhancement has been prayed for in the appeal. ( 3. ) SHRI S. K. Dwivedi, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that appellant may be allowed to make the payment of Court fee at the time of final decision of the appeal on compensation, which may be determined and miscellaneous appeal be allowed to be converted into first appeal. He has placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Bhag Singh and Ors. v.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top