SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 875

RAJENDRA MENON
MUNNA LAL – Appellant
Versus
CHIRONJILAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MAHESH GOYAL, V.K.Bharadwaj,

Judgment

( 1. ) CHALLENGING a interlocutory order dated 22-12-05 Annexure P-l passed by the court of Add1. District Judge, Sabalgarh in Civil Suit No. 12-B/05 refusing to take on record a written statement filed by the petitioners, petitioners have approached this court.

( 2. ) RESPONDENTS plaintiff had instituted a suit for recovery of rs. 4,56,000/- and interest of Rs. 1,24,000/- against one Kedar Nath, father of the present petitioners. Records indicate that after written statement was filed by the original defendant Kedar Nath, he expired and, therefore, petitioners who are sons of late Kedar Nath were brought on record.

( 3. ) AFTER petitioners were brought on record they again filed a joint written statement Annexure P-5 raising various grounds to indicate that they are not responsible for the liability incurred by their father. Grievance of the petitioners is that the written statement now filed by the petitioners is not being taken on record and the same is being rejected only on the ground that in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Gajraj Vs. Sudha, 1999 (11)MPWN 60, written statement cannot be taken on record. Shri Bharadwaj, learned counsel representi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top