SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 129

S.L.JAIN
AJAY PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY GUPTA, Prakash Gupta, SANJAY AGRAWAL,

Judgment

( 1. ) INVOKING extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the code) petitioner ajay Pandey has filed this petition for quashing the FIR dated 18-5-2006 lodged in Police Station, Habibganj, Bhopal and registered at Crime No. 466/2006.

( 2. ) THE petitioner has stated that he and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are son and daughters of late R. K. Pandey, retired Senior Member of Indian administrative Service. R. K. Pandey expired on 21-5-2005 at Bhopal. He, before his death executed a will on 17th April, 2005 in presence of Ravindra tiwari, a family friend and Advocate of more than 20 years standing and Rakesh tiwari, a Senior Officer with the Government of Madhya Pradesh. Late R. K. Pandey constructed a house situated at E-l/86, Arera Colony, Bhopal. He also left behind cash and other items of jewellery. By the aforesaid will the said house was bequeathed to the petitioner being the only son and for other deposits and investments amounting to Rs. 20 lacs nominated younger daughter, respondent no. 2. Before his death R. K. Pandey, handed over papers of immovable property to the petitioner and of deposits an















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top