SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 422

A.K.PATNAIK, K.K.LAHOTI
NEERAJ KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashish Trivedi, Kumresh Pathak,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE petitioners are residents of Revenue District Anuppur, which was carved out from Revenue District Shahdol with effect from 15th August, 2003 by notification dated 11th August, 2003 of the State Govt. issued under sub-section (2) of Section 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Code ). They have filed this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the elections of office bearers of Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Lampus Kotma, Adim Jati sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Devgawa and Adim Jati Sewa Sahkari Maryadit bhalmudi.

( 2. ) SEVERAL grounds have been taken in the writ petition challenging the election of the office bearers of the three Co-operative Societies, but we cannot consider all such grounds in view of the law laid down by Division Bench of this Court in Radhey Shyam Sharma Vs. Chairman Sewa/vriha Sahakari samiti Lashkar, Gwalior and others, 1989 MPLJ 208, that normally the High court in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution will not interfere in an election dispute of Co-operative Societies until and unless election process is shown so vitiated that it cannot be s



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top