SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 1027

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
NISHA BAI w/o DINESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMI PRABAL, M.P.S.Raghuvanshi,

Judgment

( 1. ) BY this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the pregnability of the impugned order Annexure P/1 dated 31-5-2005 passed by Collector district Guna whereby the order dated 27-11-1993 passed by Tahsildar, Guna allotting the land under M. P. Krishi Prayojan Ke Liye Upayog Ki Ja Rahi Dakhal Rahit Bhoomi par Bhoomiswami Adhikaron Ka Pradan Kiya Jana (Vishesh Upabandh)Adhiniyam, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam) has been set aside while exercising suo motu powers conferred to it under section 50 of M. P. Land revenue Code.

( 2. ) THE contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that the order of tehsildar was passed on 27-11-1993 and after near about four years the collector, Guna took the matter while exercising suo motu powers of revision which was not permissible under the law. According to learned counsel the suo motu exercise of powers of revision at the most could have been taken within a period of one year. In support of his contention learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on certain decisions of Supreme Court as well as of this Court.

( 3. ) COMBATING the aforesaid submission, Mr







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top