SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 284

N.K.MODY
JITENDRA MOHAN SINGH JAIN – Appellant
Versus
RAHUL SHRIRAM SINGH PARIHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN GUPTA, P.K.GUPTA, S.K.Meena, SAMEER VERMA,

Judgment

( 1. ) ARGUMENTS heard on merits. Order dictated in open Court. This order shall also govern the disposal of M. A. No. 1251/2005 as both the appeals are arising out of one award dated 14-12-2004 passed by Member, mact, Indore in Claim Case No. 291/2004 whereby the claim case filed by appellant was allowed and a sum of Rs. 31,000/- was awarded as compensation on account of injuries sustained by appellant. M. A No. 1529/2005 is filed by appellant for enhancement while M. A. No. 1251/2005 is filed by respondent no. 3 wherein liability of respondent No. 3 is challenged.

( 2. ) SHORT facts of the case are that appellant filed a claim case alleging that on 29-7-2003 appellant was going on his Scooty at about 4. 00 p. m. It was alleged that at that time a motor-bike bearing registration No. MP-09/jv/8215, which was driven by respondent No. 1, owned by respondent No. 2 and insured with respondent No. 3 came from other side and dashed the vehicle of appellant with the result appellant sustained fracture of shoulder and also sustained fracture of humerus bone in left hand. Appellant was hospitalized from 29-7-2003 to 30-7-2003. Permanent disability was upto the extent of 20%. Learned








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top