S.A.NAQVI, ARUN MISHRA
Manohar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
( 1. ) THE appeal has been preferred by the appellants being aggrieved by the
judgment of conviction dated dated 26-7-93 passed by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Sehore in Sessions Trial No. 279/92 whereby the appellants have been convicted for commission of offence under Section 302/34 IPC sentencing them to undergo rigorous life imprisonment.
( 2. ) AS per the prosecution case, deceased Suresh and accused persons where residing at village Khamlaha. Deceased had accompanied the accused persons in the night, he did not came back to the house. Consequently, Kishore Singh and Munnalal went to the house of Manohar to ask about the whereabouts of Suresh. For several days they inquired from Manoharlal but he expressed ignorance as to the whereabout of deceased Suresh. They also inquired from coaccused nandlal. He also expressed ignorance as to the whereabouts of deceased Suresh. The prosecution further alleged that on 3-8-92, one Sangram Singh, son of Kamal Singh found the dead body in the well and consequently, informed to the police on 4-8-92, merg intimation was recorded, inquest of the dead body was prepared, dead body was identified by Shriram, the brother of the deceased
POHALYA MOTYA VALVI Vs State of Maharashtra
GAMBHIR Vs State of Maharashtra
B.S.SAMBHU Vs T.S.KRISHNASWAMY
BALWINDER SINGH Vs State of Punjab
Anil alias Andya Sadashiv Nandoskar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Amit @ Ammu Vs State of Maharashtra
MAHMOOD Vs State of Uttar Pradesh
LAKHANPAL Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.