SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 1123

R.S.JHA
RAJ KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
USHA MUKHARIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.SANGHI, Rakesh Chaurasiya, S.K.GARG,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS Second Appeal has been filed by the tenant against whom a judgment and decree of eviction have been passed by the Fourth Civil Judge, Class -II, sagar on 1-5-2003 in Civil Suit No. 103-A/2001 and affirmed by the First appellate Court, Sagar, by the judgment and decree dated 31-3-2005 passed in civil Appeal No. 58-A/2004.

( 2. ) THE brief facts, leading to the filing of the present appeal, are that the appellant/defendant was inducted as tenant in part of house No. 308 on 1-7-1988 on Rs. 400/- per month as rent by the husband of respondent/plaintiff smt. Usha Mukhariya. Subsequently, the respondent/plaintiff gave a notice of eviction to the appellant/defendant on the ground of arrears of rent and bonafide requirement of the accommodation by the respondent/plaintiff for non-residential purpose of her son. As the notice went un-replied, a suit was filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking eviction on the grounds mentioned under sections 12 (1) (a) and 12 (1) (f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The appellant/tenant filed a written statement in which it was alleged that the respondent/plaintiff was not the l






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top