SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 865

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Budhoo – Appellant
Versus
Chironja Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ADIL USMANI, S.L.PATEL, ANURAG TIWARI, NIDHI VARMA

Judgment

( 1. ) The appellant/plaintiff has directed this appeal under section 100 of the CPC being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 30/11/1994 passed by the District Judge., Seoni in Civil Regular Appeal No. 2-A/94, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 26/3/1994 passed by the Civil Judge Class-I Lakhnadon in Civil Original Suit No. 72A/92 decreeing his suit for declaration against the respondents.

( 2. ) The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant herein filed the suit against the respondents for declaration with respect of the agricultural land bearing Survey No. 115/2, 117/2, 121/3-kh and 121/4-kh total area 16.83 acres, situated at village Pahadi, Tahsil Lakhnadon. As per averments of the plaint, the aforesaid land along with some other land total 41.80 acres was purchased jointly by the appellant and Mst. Ramko w/o Dharmu (maternal grand mother of respondents No. 1 and 2) from its earlier owner, through registered sale deed dated 12.12.1956 (Ex.P/1) in their equal share but the name of respondents No. 3 and 4, the sons of respondent No. 1 were also inserted as purcharers, in the sale deed with the name of Ramko Bai. Subsequent to such acquisition, in o
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top