SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 148

R.C.MISHRA
SHRINIWAS TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
RAJKUMAR URMALIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjay K.Agrawal, Dilip Pandey

Judgment

R.C.Mishra, J.

( 1. ) This order shall govern disposal of I.A.No.1/10 which is an application, under Order VII Rule 11(a) read with Order VI Rule 16 of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") and Section 83(l)(a) of the Representation of People Act (for short the Act), moved by the respondent no. 1 for rejection of the election petition for non-disclosure of cause of action or a triable issue.

( 2. ) The respondent nos.2 to 25 have remained unrepresented despite service of respective notices.

( 3. ) In this petition, election of the returned candidate viz. the respondent no.1 from M.P. Legislative Assembly Constituency Sirmour No.68 has been called in question on the grounds mentioned in sub-clauses (iii) and (iv) of Section 100(1)(d) of the Act with a prayer for a direction to order re-inspection/recount of ballot papers. The petitioner has further sought a declaration that, he himself has been duly elected from the Constituency.

( 4. ) According to the petitioner, on 08.12.2008 upon conclusion of the counting of votes, he had won the election by securing the highest votes and, accordingly, the official website of Election Commission of India namely



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top