SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 173

ALOK ARADHE
Satyanjay Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
Banarsi Devi – Respondent


ORDER

Alok Aradhe, J.

1. This revision under Section 23-E of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), has been filed by the Applicants/tenants in which they have called in question the legality and validity of the order dated 25-6-2010 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority (hereinafter referred to as RCA) by which the application preferred by the non-Applicant/landlady under Section 23-A(b) of the Act has been allowed by the RCA on the ground that the tenants have failed to file the application seeking leave to contest the prayer for eviction as provided under Section 23-C(1) of the Act within the prescribed time limit.

2. Facts giving rise to filing of the revision lie in a narrow compass. The non-Applicant claiming herself to be a widow, filed an application under Section 23-A(b) of the Act on the ground that she bona fide needs the suit accommodation for her grandson who wants to run the business of clothes in the accommodation in question. The notice of the proceedings before the RCA was served on the Applicants/tenants on 4-2-2010. The Applicants/tenants entered appearance through their counsel on 31-3-2010 and filed the written statement,



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top