SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 737

RAKESH SAKSENA, M.A.SIDDIQUI
Dev Vrat Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Rakesh Saksena, J.

1. Since in both the cases Petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report dated 6-1-2010 leading to the registration of Crime No. 2/2010 and its investigation by Special Police Establishment Lokayukt, Bhopal, this order shall govern the disposal of both the cases.

2. Special Police Establishment, Lokayukt, Bhopal registered the aforesaid first information report on 6-1-2010 against the Petitioners under Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sections 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. According to F.I.R, complainant Rashmi Pathak submitted a written report to Lokayukt, Bhopal on 12-5-2009. After verification, Special Police registered the F.I.R. containing accusation that Dev Vrat Mishra, the then DSP Lokayukt, Jabalpur purchased house No. 945 situated at Gulab Singh ward, Jabalpur from one N. Vijayan. In the sale deed, area of the house was shown as 1736 sq.ft. and the stamp duty of Rs. 74,025/- was paid. On verification, it was revealed that the area of the house was in fact 2454 sq.ft. On the sale deed, stamp duty of Rs. 1,03,459/- ought to have been paid whereas Dev Vrat Mishra in cons































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top