SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 788

INDRANI DATTA
Mohan Mandelia – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Indrani Datta, J.

1. This common order shall govern the disposal of M.Cr.C. No. 2853/2008 (Mohan Mandelia v. State of M.P. and Anr.) and M.Cr.C. No. 3234/2008 (Sant Kumar Sharma v. Rakesh Yadav and Anr.) as they arise out of same order dated 04.02.2008 passed by the learned JMFC Gwalior; whereby, on a complaint filed by Respondent No. 1 Rakesh Yadav, cognizance has been taken against the Petitioners under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (for brevity "Act") and under Sections 417, 418, 420, 466, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC.

2. Facts in compendium are that Respondent Rakesh filed a complaint against the Petitioners under Section 138 of Act and Sections 417, 418, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC. As per averments of complaint, Petitioner Mohan Mandelia and accused Beena Mandelia are doing business of making cartons and business is run in the name of GNTV. There was cordial relationship between complainant and Petitioner Mohan. Complainant used to give loan to Petitioner Mohan and his wife accused Beena from time to time and they used to return the said amount to complainant. It is further averred that from the year 2005 to July 2007 on various occasions Rs. 5 lac two times, R











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top