SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(MP) 103

V.R.NEWASKAR, P.K.TARE, P.V.DIXIT
MOOLCHAND – Appellant
Versus
MANGILAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.VIJAYVARGIYA, S.D.SANGHI, G.M.CHAPHEKAR

JUDGMENT :

NEWASKAR J.

( 1. ) The only point raised in this second appeal which arises out of an execution proceedings is whether a decree passed on an award creating charge upon an immovable property is a nullity in case the award is not registered in accordance with the provisions of the Registration Act.

( 2. ) The question arose when the decree-holders in such a case sought to execute the decree based on the unregistered award and got the house of the judgment-debtor sold in execution and purchased it themselves. The judgment- debtor objected to the sale on the ground that the decree was a nullity as the award had not been registered. The executing Court overruled that contention and confirmed the auction sale. The judgment-debtor thereupon appealed to the learned Additional District Judge, Dhar, before whom two Division Bench decisions of the Nagpur High Court reported in Lakhmichand v. Biharilal(T943 NLJ 154=AIR 1943 Nag. 165=ILR 1943 Nag. 293) and Uttamchand Motilalji v. Wasudeo Deorao(1946 NLJ 317=AIR 1946 Nag. 311=ILR 1946 Nag. 583), were cited, considered that the latter of the two decisions ought to prevail, followed that decision and held that the decree was a nullity and






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top