SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(MP) 69

J.S.VERMA, U.N.BHACHAWAT
HUKUMSINGH MAJBOOTSINGH CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.M.Dharmadhikari, K.L.ISSRANI,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioner was appointed Chairman in the Revenue inspectors office in 1953 and was confirmed in that capacity in 1956. The petitioner was suspended on 6-11-1974 pending a departmental enquiry into the charges contained in the charge-sheet Annexure-A. The substance of the charges levelled against him was of habitual unauthorized absence from duty for a long period and of intimidating the superior officer-the Revenue inspector-to withdraw the report made by him against the petitioner of his unauthorized absence under threat of assault. The petitioner denied these charges and consequently a departmental enquiry was held for enquiring into their correctness. The Enquiry Officer found these charges proved against the petitioner in his report Annexure-C dated 19-4-1975. A show cause notice was acordingly given to the petitioner and after considering his reply to it, the Collector, Tikamgarh, by his order Annexure-E dated 16-12-1975 accepting the report of the Enquiry Officer, terminated the petitioners service. Petitioners appeal to the Commissioner, Sagar Division, was dismissed by order Annexure-F dated 23-8-1976, and the State Government has thereafter by its orde














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top