SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(MP) 33

H.G.MISHRA, SHIV DAYAL, R.L.MURAB, A.R.NAVKAR, S.J.SURANA
RASAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.MISHRA, R.S.Bajpai,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the constitutional validity of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi [tritiya sanshodhan Adhyadesh, 1977 (M. P. Ordinance Mo. 9 of 1977) herein-after called the ordinance] has been challenged. This Bench was, therefore, constituted under Article 228-A of the Constitution.

( 2. ) BY this Ordinance, section 11 of the M. P. Krishi Upaj Mandi adhiniyam, 1972, (hereinafter called the act) has been amended. The only ground of challenge is that whereas the Act was enacted after obtaining the assent of the President, the Ordinance has been promulgated without the assent of the President.

( 3. ) THE Act provides inter alia for establishment of markets and Constitution of market committees. The petitioners case is that Mandi Committees throughout the State of Madhya Pradesh were established and incorporated under this Act. The Mandi Committee, Jora (District Morena) (Krishi Upaj mandi Committee, Jora) is one of such committees. In the month of December 1975, under the provisions of the Act election to the Mandi Committee was held on January 18, 1976. The petitioner was elected Chairman. The tenure of office is five years.






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top