SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(MP) 766

P.D.MULYE, V.D.GYANI
Madhumilan Syntex Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.O.Nema, J.P.Gupta, K.K.Venugopal, Karpey, V.S.KOKJE,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioner No. 1, Madhumilan Syntex Private Ltd. which is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and of whom petitioner No. 2 is the Managing Director owns a factory at Biora wherein they manufacture spun yarn. This product is covered by Item 18, Schedule 1 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

( 2. ) ACCORDING to the petitioners in the manufacture of their product, they use as raw material cellulosic fibre and non-cellulosic waste. By blending and processing of these raw materials, the final products spun yarn is produced.

Therefore, the product falls in para (i) of Item 18-III of the First Schedule of the Central Excises and Salt Act. Further according to the petitioners their product does not contain any man-made fibre of non cellulosic origin and, therefore, they have been classifying the product by paying the duty in accordance with the Tariff Item 18-III (i) of the said Act.

( 3. ) THAT respondent No. 4 by a demand notice dated 7th February, 1984 (Annexure A) without any prior notice or hearing, raised a demand asking the petitioners to pay within 10 days a sum of Rs. 26,47,749. 39 on the assumption that the product cleared by the petitioner


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top